> The current code allows an empty rectangle (x,y)(0x0) to contain another empty > rectangle (x,y)(0x0).
What is special about empty rectangles?
It seems perfectly reasonable that two rectangles of the same size and location each contain the other. (Or that a rectangle contains itself.)
« Back to merge proposal
> The current code allows an empty rectangle (x,y)(0x0) to contain another empty
> rectangle (x,y)(0x0).
What is special about empty rectangles?
It seems perfectly reasonable that two rectangles of the same size and location each contain the other. (Or that a rectangle contains itself.)