Code review comment for lp:~vanvugt/compiz/fix-1037411

Sam Spilsbury (smspillaz) wrote :

> I agree line 86 may be redundant, but I was covering for the case where you
> may not know which test within the fixture gets executed next. At least it's
> defensive against future maintenance.

This doesn't matter. The object is destructed upon test completion.

> I know EGL has the preservation option. There's a similar extension for GLX,
> but it was never fully implemented when I tried it last.

Curious. What was it called ?

« Back to merge proposal