Merge lp:~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-959242-4.7 into lp:gcc-linaro/4.7
- lp-959242-4.7
- Merge into 4.7
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Approved by: | Ramana Radhakrishnan |
Approved revision: | not available |
Merge reported by: | Ulrich Weigand |
Merged at revision: | not available |
Proposed branch: | lp:~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-959242-4.7 |
Merge into: | lp:gcc-linaro/4.7 |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-959242-4.7 |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Linaro Toolchain Developers | Pending | ||
Review via email: mp+104381@code.launchpad.net |
This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2012-04-28.
Commit message
Description of the change
Fix LP 959242.
Update 2012-04-28: Fix test regressions.
Update 2012-05-02: Update to address review comments.
2012-05-04: Patch is now upstream in current form.
OK to land backport in Linaro GCC 4.7?
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on i686-natty-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: i686-natty-
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
+FAIL: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/vect...
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r114984 and queued it for build.
The diff against the ancestor r114982 is available at:
http://
and will be built on the following builders:
a9-builder armv5-builder i686 x86_64
You can track the build queue at:
http://
cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro-
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro+bzr114982
cbuild-state: check
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro+bzr114982
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on i686-natty-
The build results are available at:
http://
The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro+bzr114982
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: i686-natty-
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.target/
The full...
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.target/
The full diff ...
Michael Hope (michaelh1) wrote : | # |
cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r114985 and queued it for build.
The diff against the ancestor r114982 is available at:
http://
and will be built on the following builders:
a9-builder armv5-builder i686 x86_64
You can track the build queue at:
http://
cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro-
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro+bzr114982
cbuild-state: check
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on i686-natty-
The build results are available at:
http://
The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro+bzr114982
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: i686-natty-
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on x86_64-
The build results are available at:
http://
The testsuite results are the same as the branch point lp:gcc-linaro+bzr114982
The full diff is at:
http://
The full testsuite results are at:
http://
cbuild-checked: x86_64-
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.target/
...
Linaro Toolchain Builder (cbuild) wrote : | # |
cbuild successfully built this on armv7l-
The build results are available at:
http://
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
-PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.dg/
+PASS: gcc.target/
The fu...
Ramana Radhakrishnan (ramana) wrote : | # |
test results look fine - the only question is whether this should go into the upstream GCC 4.7 branch as well ?
Ramana
Ramana Radhakrishnan (ramana) wrote : | # |
On 8 May 2012 11:18, Ramana Radhakrishnan
<email address hidden> wrote:
> test results look fine - the only question is whether this should go into the upstream GCC 4.7 branch as well ?
Ignore the comment about FSF 4.7 branch .This is OK to merge
Ramana
>
> Ramana
> --
> https:/
> Your team Linaro Toolchain Developers is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-959242-4.7 into lp:gcc-linaro.
cbuild has taken a snapshot of this branch at r114983 and queued it for build.
The diff against the ancestor r114982 is available at: builds. linaro. org/toolchain/ snapshots/ gcc-linaro- 4.7+bzr114983~ uweigand~ lp-959242- 4.7.diff
http://
and will be built on the following builders:
a9-builder armv5-builder i686 x86_64
You can track the build queue at: ex.seabright. co.nz/helpers/ scheduler
http://
cbuild-snapshot: gcc-linaro- 4.7+bzr114983~ uweigand~ lp-959242- 4.7
cbuild-ancestor: lp:gcc-linaro+bzr114982
cbuild-state: check