As I understand it the code currently fails because there is output on stderr.
But by redirecting stderr to stdout (2>&1), there will now be no output on stderr. So if we intend to detect and fail on other error output, this prevents that.
« Back to merge proposal
As I understand it the code currently fails because there is output on stderr.
But by redirecting stderr to stdout (2>&1), there will now be no output on stderr. So if we intend to detect and fail on other error output, this prevents that.