In the debian version, the binary package is called libgoocanvas-2.0,
and it installs the files
debian/tmp/usr/lib/libgoocanvas-2.0.so.*
Is this right?
The debian policy manual mentions having to call ldconfig to make a
libgoocanvas-2.0.so symlink, or including the symlink in the package.
I don't do either at the moment. What is the right thing to do? There
is also some SHLIBS things in rules that I just copied from the old
package:
I don't think this could make it into debian testing in time, as it
isn't even in sid right now. The debian maintainer seems to be rather
busy atm. Should I submit it to Ubuntu separately at some point?
Micah: it would be great if you could have a look at the debian package, up at /code.launchpad .net/~tkluck/ debian/ sid/goocanvas/ v2.0
https:/
In the debian version, the binary package is called libgoocanvas-2.0,
and it installs the files
debian/ tmp/usr/ lib/libgoocanva s-2.0.so. *
Is this right?
The debian policy manual mentions having to call ldconfig to make a
libgoocanvas-2.0.so symlink, or including the symlink in the package.
I don't do either at the moment. What is the right thing to do? There
is also some SHLIBS things in rules that I just copied from the old
package:
DEB_SHLIBDEPS_ INCLUDE_ libgoocanvas- 2.0 := debian/ libgoocanvas- 2.0/usr/ lib MAKESHLIBS_ ARGS_libgoocanv as-2.0 := -V"libgoocanvas-2.0 (>= 2.0)"
DEB_DH_
I don't know if this is right.
I don't think this could make it into debian testing in time, as it
isn't even in sid right now. The debian maintainer seems to be rather
busy atm. Should I submit it to Ubuntu separately at some point?