Yes indeed, they are not equivalent. Getting tired :)
-sbi
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Stefan Rijnhart (Therp) <email address hidden>wrote:
> Thanks for the review! > > I would always go for the latter in cases like: > > bar = foo.get('bar') > if bar: > ... > > But as I was going to run a string operation on the result, I didn't want > to run the risk of sepa_dict containing a key 'TRTP' with value False (even > if the preceding code currently seems to guarantee that when sepa_dict > contains a key 'TRTP', the value will always be a string) > -- > > https://code.launchpad.net/~therp-nl/banking-addons/7.0-abnamro-sepa_type_case/+merge/188782 > You are reviewing the proposed merge of > lp:~therp-nl/banking-addons/7.0-abnamro-sepa_type_case into > lp:banking-addons. >
« Back to merge proposal
Yes indeed, they are not equivalent. Getting tired :)
-sbi
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Stefan Rijnhart (Therp) <email address hidden>wrote:
> Thanks for the review! /code.launchpad .net/~therp- nl/banking- addons/ 7.0-abnamro- sepa_type_ case/+merge/ 188782
>
> I would always go for the latter in cases like:
>
> bar = foo.get('bar')
> if bar:
> ...
>
> But as I was going to run a string operation on the result, I didn't want
> to run the risk of sepa_dict containing a key 'TRTP' with value False (even
> if the preceding code currently seems to guarantee that when sepa_dict
> contains a key 'TRTP', the value will always be a string)
> --
>
> https:/
> You are reviewing the proposed merge of
> lp:~therp-nl/banking-addons/7.0-abnamro-sepa_type_case into
> lp:banking-addons.
>