l.183 I think the intended tuple of types was (int, long) instead of (int, float).
l.182 an indentation level could be avoided by returning early in the method (maybe a matter of taste though)
Besides that, LGTM
« Back to merge proposal
l.183 I think the intended tuple of types was (int, long) instead of (int, float).
l.182 an indentation level could be avoided by returning early in the method (maybe a matter of taste though)
Besides that, LGTM