Code review comment for lp:~ted/unity/systemd-unit.

On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 16:09 +0000, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
> Mh, this is better... I would have guessed this was done at each
> indicator level, but I can go with this too.
Yes, systemd is "backwards" to Upstart in that you define a state and
how to achieve that state instead of an event that you listen for. So
the state is panel-service running and you achieve that by starting the
indicators instead of the panel service asking the indicators to start.
I miss Upstart, I think it made more sense too :-(
> One only minor thing, it shouldn't never happen that the lockscreen is there without ups running, but... For safety I think it would be better to also add
>

Yup, good idea, added.