Code review comment for lp:~ted/libindicator/upstart-no-dbus

On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 16:18 +0000, Lars Uebernickel wrote:

> All of these things will be true anyway, because upstart *is* managing
> the services.

I guess, but I'm not sure why you're concerned over the job
configuration having:

  start on dbus-activation com.canonical.indicator.network

versus

  start on indicators-loaded

It seems like the second one is clearer and can be managed more easily
as we'll be able to introspect the startup with things like initctl2dot.