On Tuesday 26 February 2013 04:37 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> I suspect you want an empty default meta data instead. Only tests that actually use the new test definitions should have that section filled in. This is similar to what most recent evolutions were doing, namely, adding optional values that have empty defaults.
Hi Zyga,
On Tuesday 26 February 2013 04:37 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> I suspect you want an empty default meta data instead. Only tests that actually use the new test definitions should have that section filled in. This is similar to what most recent evolutions were doing, namely, adding optional values that have empty defaults.
I just committed a patch and re-requested review.
Thank You. www.stylesen. org/ www.sasenthilku maran.com/
--
Senthil Kumaran S
http://
http://