Laurynas Biveinis <email address hidden> writes:
> Review: Needs Information > > Does this apply to 5.1? (If it does, should be fixed there first and > merged up...)
Haven't checked to be honest :)
> > Why did you add the "impossible case" if (!block_mutex) ... ?
It was there in original code that was missed during merge.... it is a bit odd though.
-- Stewart Smith
« Back to merge proposal
Laurynas Biveinis <email address hidden> writes:
> Review: Needs Information
>
> Does this apply to 5.1? (If it does, should be fixed there first and
> merged up...)
Haven't checked to be honest :)
>
> Why did you add the "impossible case" if (!block_mutex) ... ?
It was there in original code that was missed during merge.... it is a
bit odd though.
--
Stewart Smith