Code review comment for lp:~stefanor/ibid/pandoc-man-511899

> I thought pandoc supported restructured text? Is it not more consistent to
> stick with rst?

Yes, that was my original intention. However it doesn't seem to support building the man-page header fields when converting from rst to nroff.
I switched and also noted that markdown would be conciser than the equivalent rst, which was enough to convince me to stick with it.