Code review comment for lp:~smspillaz/compiz-libcompizconfig/ccs-object

> I know it is common (and may be a project style) but there is no advantage to
> having different names to refer to the same thing in different namespaces.
> That is not:
>
> typedef struct _CCSObject CCSObject;
>
> struct _CCSObject
> {
> ...
> };
>
> but:
>
> typedef struct CCSObject
> {
> ...
> } CCSObject;

Actually, it doesn't seem that client code should be interested in the members of [_]CCSObject, so why not a completely opaque type? Vis:

    typedef struct CCSObject CCSObject;

in the header. And move the definition to the .c file.