On 07/05/2012 09:26 AM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> I guess we want to minimize differences between the HailDB and XB versions of the utilities, and IMHO api0internal.h makes more sense in the former where there is no innodb_int.h. I agree we could name files better for XB, but for the HailDB modifications it makes sense to stick with foo0bar naming convention. But this is not a very strong opinion.
>
I remember we were discussing this, but I'm not sure about our current
plans about the HailDB version of the utilities. Do we have anything
specific set?
Laurynas,
On 07/05/2012 09:26 AM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> I guess we want to minimize differences between the HailDB and XB versions of the utilities, and IMHO api0internal.h makes more sense in the former where there is no innodb_int.h. I agree we could name files better for XB, but for the HailDB modifications it makes sense to stick with foo0bar naming convention. But this is not a very strong opinion.
>
I remember we were discussing this, but I'm not sure about our current
plans about the HailDB version of the utilities. Do we have anything
specific set?