Code review comment for lp:~salvatore-orlando/neutron/quantum-api-alignment

Revision history for this message
Salvatore Orlando (salvatore-orlando) wrote :

> One other question for you: as part of nova + quantum integration, I'm
> prototyping the "admin API" interfaces to communicate information like
> interface-ownership (for authenticating attachments) and interface-bindings
> (for knowing where a vif was deployed).
>
> My gut says that we should not hold up the 1.0 version while waiting to
> include these items, but I wanted to get your thoughts there. We definitely
> will need to document these eventually though, as there will be other
> openstack services that want to integrate with Quantum.

Good point. I guess the admin API has a different endpoint, as it should be exposed by nova, is that correct?
In that case I'm not entirely sure this should be part of the Quantum API at all (for instance if it going to be an Openstack API extension, why should it be documented in Quantum API). I can't find a blueprint for tracking this piece of work, can you give me a pointer?

My plan to lock down the API for this week is motivated by the fact that we have to lock down features by Aug 25, and then do bug fixing and system testing until diablo release. If you think that we only have two weeks left, and given that code review process usually takes a week, this means that the best way to ensure a timely completion for the API blueprint is to start locking down the spec this week, and then work the week after on the code.

« Back to merge proposal