On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:13:14PM -0000, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Now to the scary part: it might make sense to provide a panda hwpack built
> from mainline kernels, and then a TI BSP based one; I don't know how we
> would name them, maybe -panda and -ti-panda.
What about "panda-bsp" or "bsp-panda"? Calling it "-ti-" is also ambiguous.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:13:14PM -0000, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Now to the scary part: it might make sense to provide a panda hwpack built
> from mainline kernels, and then a TI BSP based one; I don't know how we
> would name them, maybe -panda and -ti-panda.
What about "panda-bsp" or "bsp-panda"? Calling it "-ti-" is also ambiguous.