Code review comment for lp:~rryan/mixxx/atomic-co
Revision history for this message
| Daniel Schürmann (daschuer) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
f33e652
(Get the code!)
.. m_defaultValue.
* I would like to get rid of sub and add. It may implies that it is an atomic operation.
* We may introduce a One reader version, instead where sub and add is save.
* The same issue may occur for all other read modify write actions inside the user code.
* We only have to decide if we verify the use by the CPU (overhead) or if we rely on the correctness of the user code?