> This works great! But the new effective page increment might be > unintentionally large. Since it's 8 with a "scaling factor" of 2x it actually > jumps 16 at a time. I would recommend 4 now to get the effect of 8:
Thanks for spotting that, fixed.
« Back to merge proposal
> This works great! But the new effective page increment might be
> unintentionally large. Since it's 8 with a "scaling factor" of 2x it actually
> jumps 16 at a time. I would recommend 4 now to get the effect of 8:
Thanks for spotting that, fixed.