> We've a rule in the codebase that we don't have null dependencies (and use
> null objects instead). I don't think we should be making an exception here
> just to avoid having a trivial NullMessageProcessor class.
I wasn't aware that is the case, I'll work on fixing that. Can you please add this information to the style guide?
> We've a rule in the codebase that we don't have null dependencies (and use essor class.
> null objects instead). I don't think we should be making an exception here
> just to avoid having a trivial NullMessageProc
I wasn't aware that is the case, I'll work on fixing that. Can you please add this information to the style guide?