Mir

Code review comment for lp:~robert-ancell/mir/frontend-class-renaming

Revision history for this message
Alan Griffiths (alan-griffiths) wrote :

I'm happy with the motivation. Not so happy with some aspects of the proposed changes.

Dependencies should always be on interfaces, not concrete classes - so I think it wrong to conflate MessageProcessor and ProtobufMessageProcessor.

We've a rule in the codebase that we don't have null dependencies (and use null objects instead). I don't think we should be making an exception here just to avoid having a trivial NullMessageProcessor class.

review: Needs Fixing

« Back to merge proposal