There is a possible argument that "Protobuf" prefixes are appropriate, should anyone want to add support for other protocols later. Though I'm not entirely sure the existing design is sufficient to support a clean replacement of the protocol layer like that. So simpler is better for now.
There is a possible argument that "Protobuf" prefixes are appropriate, should anyone want to add support for other protocols later. Though I'm not entirely sure the existing design is sufficient to support a clean replacement of the protocol layer like that. So simpler is better for now.