> well, looks good to me.
>
> 83 + virtual ~SessionContainer() {};
> could be virtual ~SessionContainer() = default; ,which gives the stronger
> noexcept guarantee. (some of our classes have this, some don't but I think
> we're moving more towards this convention)
I copied ServerConfiguration here in doing it this way. When I originally had the default destructor it stops the mock SessionContainer classes from working (not sure why).
> well, looks good to me.
>
> 83 + virtual ~SessionContainer() {};
> could be virtual ~SessionContainer() = default; ,which gives the stronger
> noexcept guarantee. (some of our classes have this, some don't but I think
> we're moving more towards this convention)
I copied ServerConfiguration here in doing it this way. When I originally had the default destructor it stops the mock SessionContainer classes from working (not sure why).