Code review comment for lp:~roadmr/checkbox/packaging-canonical-certification-server-updates

Apparently this merge request goes against the current of existing plans:

09:39 <@spineau> roadmr: I really want to delete the binaries from checkbox-ng
                 so that we can host them in the relevant providers

This is what Ara and Jeff want, and apparently it's the intended plan. Sylvain said:

09:44 <@spineau> roadmr: for short term I'd vote for your MR to restore ccs
                 installation but ideally checkbox-ng should support profiles
                 like checkbox-gui, not positional arguments

So having c-c-s be installable and depend on correct stuff (for the time being) is a desirable goal. A possibility is this:

09:46 < roadmr> spineau: ok, I'll see if I can find another alternative. Maybe
                even introducing another package (c-c-s-interim) that installs
                checkbox-ng and the provider would be cleaner and easier to
                revert later
09:46 < roadmr> c-c-s-interim could Breaks: c-c-s (so it gets removed for the
                time being) and Depends: checkbox-ng provider
09:47 < roadmr> then when we make everything right again, c-c-s Breaks:
                c-c-s-interim to start deprecating it

I'll read a bit on debian packaging and think about the implications of this interim package (to be clear, it'd be a very temporary solution while everything else coalesces and stabilizes) and come up with a better fix.