Code review comment for lp:~ricgard/maas/node-details-design-amednments

Revision history for this message
Raphaƫl Badin (rvb) wrote :

Looks good. I must say the placement of the "Back to machine details" (http://people.canonical.com/~rvb/back_to.png) looks a bit odd to me: it seems a bit too close to node name and also that's not a pattern I recognize (have we used this anywhere else?).

review: Approve

« Back to merge proposal