Code review comment for ~renanrodrigo/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools:upload-27.5-jammy

Thanks for your feedback, Athos,

- Ack - will update the MR to include the missing changelog entries;

- I will ping the security team about the missing page, they should handle it;

- Yes, technically we wouldn't need those .get calls. Yes, we do always expect that every resource has a name and this is not meant to change. The .get calls were inserted based on a review to make us extra-safe where it could fail.

- Yes, this is true and the team is aware of that. The change to the factory function helped us sort out some functionality on how to get the presentation name for resources, we understand the changes and their impact, and we consider it to be aligned with what we wanted to deliver. The passing test scenarios indicate to us that our flows are working as expected.