> I'm not entirely sure what you think is fragile about executable_path()? We're > already using it elsewhere in the tests.
Having looked again I think I misunderstood how this solution works. It isn't as bad as I thought.
« Back to merge proposal
> I'm not entirely sure what you think is fragile about executable_path()? We're
> already using it elsewhere in the tests.
Having looked again I think I misunderstood how this solution works. It isn't as bad as I thought.