Code review comment for lp:~psivaa/qa-iso-static-validation-test/qa-iso-static-validation-test

I was under the impression that both of them are generated independently. Please see below a reply from cjwatson about one of my queries about some entries in report.html.

"psivaa: yep. they're all listed on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/quantal_probs.html, so it isn't an image build problem."

So this means there are occasions where the entries in report.html are not present in _probs.html and in that case it shows an image build issue. Hence needs reporting. But if the package is present on both reports we do not have to worry about them because the dev teams are aware of them

Re: not handling the exception for urlopen, I'll add it and resubmit.

Thanks