Code review comment for lp:~prateek/duplicity/s3-glacier

Revision history for this message
edso (ed.so) wrote :

On 26.02.2014 22:08, someone1 wrote:
> I meant to push this up immediately but I thought I try a test upload first. It ran through fine, here is the fix: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~prateek/duplicity/s3-glacier/revision/935
>
> Do you prefer I put in another Merge request or just one off this separately?
>

could you please check how duplicity behaves after that. lazy imports in _init are intentionally there to circumvent import errors during initial backend imports.

just check how duplicity behaves when not having boto avail and using a different backend, say file:// for simplicity. it shouldn't complain about missing boto in that case.

..ede/duply.net

« Back to merge proposal