@andreserl I have made the requested change but would like another review from you as I wasn't sure if when a release is not an ESM release (all non-LTS releases) the esm_eol should be "" or the eol date.
« Back to merge proposal
@andreserl I have made the requested change but would like another review from you as I wasn't sure if when a release is not an ESM release (all non-LTS releases) the esm_eol should be "" or the eol date.