Code review comment for ~philroche/maas-images:feature/esm-image-sync-support

Revision history for this message
Philip Roche (philroche) wrote :

@andreserl I have made the requested change but would like another review from you as I wasn't sure if when a release is not an ESM release (all non-LTS releases) the esm_eol should be "" or the eol date.

« Back to merge proposal