On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Anders Logg <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:39:22PM -0000, Garth Wells wrote:
>> Looks like this breaks with the Epetra backed again. It should be fixed properly.
>
> How will this patch affect the Epetra backend? The patch only
> introduces a fix that makes PeriodicBC run again with PETSc.
>
That's not the case. The added test in this change in
test/unit/fem/python/PeriodicBC.py
does not work with Epetra for the same reason the code did not work
with PETSc, and which is why a proper fix is needed.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Anders Logg <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:39:22PM -0000, Garth Wells wrote:
>> Looks like this breaks with the Epetra backed again. It should be fixed properly.
>
> How will this patch affect the Epetra backend? The patch only
> introduces a fix that makes PeriodicBC run again with PETSc.
>
That's not the case. The added test in this change in
test/ unit/fem/ python/ PeriodicBC. py
does not work with Epetra for the same reason the code did not work
with PETSc, and which is why a proper fix is needed.
Garth
> -- /code.launchpad .net/~pefarrell /dolfin/ periodic- malloc/ +merge/ 132257
> Anders
>
> --
> https:/
> Your team DOLFIN Core Team is subscribed to branch lp:dolfin.