On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Ying-Chun Liu <email address hidden> wrote:
> yeah, it is a good point.
> But I also can understand what dobey was worrying about.
> I'll need to confirm if 1) is true.
> Is that field the required framework, or just *supported* framework.
Required AIUI. From [1]:
For future expansion (e.g. applications that require multiple
frameworks), the syntax of “framework” is formally that of a Debian
dependency relationship field. Currently, only a simple name is
permitted, e.g. “framework”: “ubuntu-sdk-13.10”.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Ying-Chun Liu <email address hidden> wrote:
> yeah, it is a good point.
> But I also can understand what dobey was worrying about.
> I'll need to confirm if 1) is true.
> Is that field the required framework, or just *supported* framework.
Required AIUI. From [1]:
For future expansion (e.g. applications that require multiple
frameworks), the syntax of “framework” is formally that of a Debian
dependency relationship field. Currently, only a simple name is
permitted, e.g. “framework”: “ubuntu-sdk-13.10”.
[1] https:/ /click. readthedocs. org/en/ latest/ file-format. html#manifest