> It looks like we grab the info for the file
> from its containing directory. I think what we would really want is to have
> the permissions be obtained from the file that is being replaced.
Isn't atomicfile ensuring the permissions are preserved ?
copy_ownership only applies when running as root anyway...
> Is this really what we want to do?
It's what we did before.
> It looks like we grab the info for the file
> from its containing directory. I think what we would really want is to have
> the permissions be obtained from the file that is being replaced.
Isn't atomicfile ensuring the permissions are preserved ?
copy_ownership only applies when running as root anyway...