Merge ~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/vblade:merge into ~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/vblade:ubuntu/devel

[Christian Ehrhardt ]

vblade (22-1ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium

  * Merge from Debian
  * Drop changes:
    - Init scripts
    - vblade-persist depencency change from recommended to suggested
      (this was missing as delta in former changelogs, now behaves as in Debian)
  * Remaining changes:
    - Update maintainer according to spec.
  * init script and its config are conffiles, so dropping them requires
    cleaning them up via d/vblade.maintscript
    - this is a prep step to be able convert the package to a sync in the next
      upgrade
  * d/vblade.NEWS contains some extra pointers how to handle the transition
    for former users of the conffiles

 -- Christian Ehrhardt <email address hidden> Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:19:13 +0100

vblade (22-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release:
    - Add big-endian support.
    - Buffer boundary cleanups.
    - FreeBSD BPF and MTU fixes.
    - New offset and size options.
  * Moved to 3.0 (quilt) format.
  * debian/control:
    - Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes).
    - Added Vcs-Browser/Vcs-Git.
  * debian/patches:
    - no_hyphens_in_manpages: Refreshed and added more matches.
    - hardening_ldflags: New, to add CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS.
  * debian/watch: Added.
  * debian/rules: Moved it to dh and simplified a lot, while adding hardening.
  * debian/compat: Bumped to 9 to benefit among others of dpkg-buildflags.
  * debian/copyright: Moved it to DEP5 format.

[Robie Basak (racb)]

Looks good, thanks!

A couple of really minor suggestions to debian/changelog: https://git.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/vblade/log/?h=merge

1. Document why we're causing users inconvenience
2. No need to document update-maintainer change (this is implied in all Ubuntu merges - I guess this got carried forward all the way from before we had settled on this)

If this looks good to you, I'll upload.

review: Approve

[Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer)]

Thanks,
I'm happy that it looks good to you.

I'm totally fine with the minor changes to the changelog - ack to these.

Also I took the opportunity and added the "update maintainers is implicit
and doesn't have to be in changelog" to our wiki page.

Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Robie Basak <email address hidden>
wrote:

> Review: Approve
>
> Looks good, thanks!
>
> A couple of really minor suggestions to debian/changelog:
> https://git.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/vblade/log/?h=merge
>
> 1. Document why we're causing users inconvenience
> 2. No need to document update-maintainer change (this is implied in all
> Ubuntu merges - I guess this got carried forward all the way from before we
> had settled on this)
>
> If this looks good to you, I'll upload.
> --
>
> https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/vblade/+git/vblade/+merge/286138
> You are the owner of ~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/vblade:merge.
>