> If all here looks good, then it should be up to me to wait for
> everything else to be complete as well :-) That way I can
> control the potential extra delay instead of waiting for a
> re-review then.
Of course. I did mention that the changes look good in the very first sentence of the initial review and wrote about the other concerns/questions/curiosities, heh :)
That said, here's the more official review:
* Changelog:
- [✔] changelog entry correct version and targeted codename
- [✔] changelog entries correct
- [✔] update-maintainer has been run
* Actual changes:
- [✔] no upstream changes to consider
- [✔] no further upstream version to consider
- [✔] debian changes look safe
* New Delta:
- [✔] no new patches added
* Build/Test:
- [✔] build is ok
- [✔] verified PPA package installs/uninstalls
- [✔] sanity checks test fine
Hi Christian,
> If all here looks good, then it should be up to me to wait for
> everything else to be complete as well :-) That way I can
> control the potential extra delay instead of waiting for a
> re-review then.
Of course. I did mention that the changes look good in the very first sentence of the initial review and wrote about the other concerns/ questions/ curiosities, heh :)
That said, here's the more official review:
* Changelog:
- [✔] changelog entry correct version and targeted codename
- [✔] changelog entries correct
- [✔] update-maintainer has been run
* Actual changes:
- [✔] no upstream changes to consider
- [✔] no further upstream version to consider
- [✔] debian changes look safe
* New Delta:
- [✔] no new patches added
* Build/Test:
- [✔] build is ok
- [✔] verified PPA package installs/uninstalls
- [✔] sanity checks test fine
Thanks to Michael Brown for testing this fix! \o/