Hi Utkarsh,
0526a15 and all the others you asked for were forwarded to Debian and there decided against it.
The reason behind that is that our container story around LXD being a system container is very different to theirs.
Without that motivation I can understand why they didn't want but we needed it.
So that is one of the "fair and ok on both sides" differences between Debian & Ubuntu.
All the other bits you have wondered belong to that context e.g. libcap2-bin is only needed for our container check. The call to the wrapper is only needed for our container handling, ...
---
Finally about d/ch "Drop patches present in v4.2" might seem short, but you'll see that in the former version we have used exactly that term. And all that I could do in the new changelog is repeating that file names which seemed superlfuous.
If you want them added it is just a copy of lines 90-92 up to 29 and done.
So let me know if you think this is really better.
Hi Utkarsh,
0526a15 and all the others you asked for were forwarded to Debian and there decided against it.
The reason behind that is that our container story around LXD being a system container is very different to theirs.
Without that motivation I can understand why they didn't want but we needed it.
So that is one of the "fair and ok on both sides" differences between Debian & Ubuntu.
All the other bits you have wondered belong to that context e.g. libcap2-bin is only needed for our container check. The call to the wrapper is only needed for our container handling, ...
---
Finally about d/ch "Drop patches present in v4.2" might seem short, but you'll see that in the former version we have used exactly that term. And all that I could do in the new changelog is repeating that file names which seemed superlfuous.
If you want them added it is just a copy of lines 90-92 up to 29 and done.
So let me know if you think this is really better.