Code review comment for lp:~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-bionic-linux-fails-march-2019

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

After a discussion this morning on IRC.

[10:30] <cpaelzer> apw: have you seen the merge above ^^ ?
[10:30] <cpaelzer> that tries to hint a few unreliable kernel autopkgtest on bionic
[10:31] <apw> i saw you pointed at it, i think the second hunk is a no-brainer, the i386 thing less obviously ok
[10:33] <cpaelzer> apw: less ok might be true, but the results at http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/linux/bionic/i386 seem clearly indicating that atm it is not working
[10:33] <cpaelzer> apw: we could hint i386 with a version
[10:33] <cpaelzer> to let things through
[10:33] <apw> cpaelzer, right and wanting to find out why it is being ignored is mattering to me
[10:33] <apw> cpaelzer, right, make it a version and i think it is acceptable
[10:33] <cpaelzer> ok, I'll make a version for now
[...]
[10:40] <cpaelzer> apw: I have checked what versions currently block things on SRUs, that is why I added the last four versions
[10:40] <apw> cpaelzer, ack thanks
[11:06] <cpaelzer> apw: you said ack to the britney MP but it isn't merged yet - will that be done later and I can forget it, or are there other things that need to resolve first?
[11:06] <apw> cpaelzer, mearly time for my fingers to get round to it

Due to that - anyone of the SRU Team has the permissions to do so, I have modified the review slot for other SRU members to help here - this doesn't have to be only on Andy's shoulders anymore.

« Back to merge proposal