On Saturday 08 January 2011, you wrote:
> Hi Albert
>
> Yes, i just spoke the possibility to have one, not by default on a official
> module
>
> it more quickly for us to add one attribute in the XML, instead of add code
> in "create" or "write" method
I like the idea, in general. That's why I had initially given it a ++ vote.
However, in any features that we decide to officially support (anything we put
in the RNG ) needs to be well thought of and "stay" for long. We cannot add
and then remove or redefine features like that.
So, suggested course:
We define the specification (in a blueprint, a RFC-style text or something), we
share our opinions on it and then we (all) agree to support it. In the feature
submission window of v6.1, we include it, eventually.
On Saturday 08 January 2011, you wrote:
> Hi Albert
>
> Yes, i just spoke the possibility to have one, not by default on a official
> module
>
> it more quickly for us to add one attribute in the XML, instead of add code
> in "create" or "write" method
I like the idea, in general. That's why I had initially given it a ++ vote.
However, in any features that we decide to officially support (anything we put
in the RNG ) needs to be well thought of and "stay" for long. We cannot add
and then remove or redefine features like that.
So, suggested course:
We define the specification (in a blueprint, a RFC-style text or something), we
share our opinions on it and then we (all) agree to support it. In the feature
submission window of v6.1, we include it, eventually.