Merge lp:~ogayot/whoopsie/whoopsie into lp:whoopsie
Status: | Merged | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Merge reported by: | Brian Murray | ||||
Merged at revision: | not available | ||||
Proposed branch: | lp:~ogayot/whoopsie/whoopsie | ||||
Merge into: | lp:whoopsie | ||||
Diff against target: |
141 lines (+56/-10) 3 files modified
debian/changelog (+10/-0) src/whoopsie.c (+45/-9) src/whoopsie.h (+1/-1) |
||||
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~ogayot/whoopsie/whoopsie | ||||
Related bugs: |
|
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Brian Murray | Needs Information | ||
Daisy Pluckers | Pending | ||
Review via email: mp+414804@code.launchpad.net |
Commit message
Add option for exiting right after processing existing files.
Description of the change
Hello,
This merge proposal is a preliminary step for moving to path-based activation of whoopsie should we decide to.
The main idea is to add to whoopsie the option to process existing reports and then exit immediately.
It consists of two different commits:
1, stop calling process_
2. add the --no-polling switch so that whoopsie can process existing files and exit directly (rev 724)
This PR should have no incidence on the way whoopsie operates by default (i.e. without the --no-polling option).
In a subsequent merge proposal, we can move to path-based activation by changing the systemd unit files. More work might be needed in whoopsie itself if we want to improve the integration with apport though.
This looks great and I'm happy to upload it, but I have one question which appears in the diff.