On 2014/05/09 09:15:52, jameinel wrote:
> I'd be happier if we were doing HostPorts storage on this, so that we
could see
> the list of ones to try first, and then what to try second
(cloud-local first,
> etc).
> Are there plans to push all the way to that point? This could be an ok
> bridge-the-gap, I just worry that it will be good-enough-for-now and
we don't
> actually fix the underlying issues.
I hadn't had plans to do that, though I do agree it's a better approach.
I can do that if we think it's worth a little extra work.
On 2014/05/09 09:15:52, jameinel wrote:
> I'd be happier if we were doing HostPorts storage on this, so that we
could see
> the list of ones to try first, and then what to try second
(cloud-local first,
> etc).
> Are there plans to push all the way to that point? This could be an ok
> bridge-the-gap, I just worry that it will be good-enough-for-now and
we don't
> actually fix the underlying issues.
I hadn't had plans to do that, though I do agree it's a better approach.
I can do that if we think it's worth a little extra work.
https:/ /codereview. appspot. com/91270044/