> The test intentionally uses a charm, because it represents a real world
> situation where the charm is the thing outputting a lot of logging. I don't
> know that I could reasonably create a juju run command that would do the same
> thing.
You can log in a hook context and juju run has a hook context, though, right?
I'll accept a version that is not self-contained, I just wondered whether it was possible.
> The test intentionally uses a charm, because it represents a real world
> situation where the charm is the thing outputting a lot of logging. I don't
> know that I could reasonably create a juju run command that would do the same
> thing.
You can log in a hook context and juju run has a hook context, though, right?
I'll accept a version that is not self-contained, I just wondered whether it was possible.