Code review comment for lp:~natefinch/juju-ci-tools/logrot

Revision history for this message
Aaron Bentley (abentley) wrote :

> The test intentionally uses a charm, because it represents a real world
> situation where the charm is the thing outputting a lot of logging. I don't
> know that I could reasonably create a juju run command that would do the same
> thing.

You can log in a hook context and juju run has a hook context, though, right?

I'll accept a version that is not self-contained, I just wondered whether it was possible.

« Back to merge proposal