Code review comment for lp:~mterry/unity8/no-touch-no-lifecycle

Revision history for this message
Michael Terry (mterry) wrote :

> This commit message is not correct. Unity 8 is *already* controlling the lifecycle policy.

Sort of. Qtmir was overriding unity8's requests based on its own handling of the exception list. This branch moves that handling into unity8, so that unity8 is wholly responsible for policy. I've made the commit message clearer.

> test_lifecyclePolicy is testing again ground already covered by test_unfocusedAppsAreResumedWhenEnteringWindowedMode and test_unfocusedAppsGetSuspendedAfterEnteringStagedMode.

Sure, OK. I'll split the test in two (exception list and isTouchApp) and remove the sanity checks that duplicate checks in those tests. New commit coming.

« Back to merge proposal