If I stop applying all the patches from this branch (debian/patches/series list), and try to build the package using the 23.03 orig source tarball from your ppa, I get one discrepancy:
--- landscape-client-23.02.orig/landscape/lib/disk.py
+++ landscape-client-23.02/landscape/lib/disk.py
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ from landscape.lib.compat import _PY3
# List of filesystem types authorized when generating disk use statistics.
STABLE_FILESYSTEMS = frozenset(
["ext", "ext2", "ext3", "ext4", "reiserfs", "ntfs", "msdos", "dos", "vfat",
- "xfs", "hpfs", "jfs", "ufs", "hfs", "hfsplus", "simfs", "drvfs", "lxfs"])
+ "xfs", "hpfs", "jfs", "ufs", "hfs", "hfsplus", "simfs"])
That is a diff between the orig tarball, and the branch contents. They should be identical.
If I stop applying all the patches from this branch (debian/ patches/ series list), and try to build the package using the 23.03 orig source tarball from your ppa, I get one discrepancy:
--- landscape- client- 23.02.orig/ landscape/ lib/disk. py client- 23.02/landscape /lib/disk. py lib.compat import _PY3
+++ landscape-
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ from landscape.
# List of filesystem types authorized when generating disk use statistics.
STABLE_FILESYSTEMS = frozenset(
["ext", "ext2", "ext3", "ext4", "reiserfs", "ntfs", "msdos", "dos", "vfat",
- "xfs", "hpfs", "jfs", "ufs", "hfs", "hfsplus", "simfs", "drvfs", "lxfs"])
+ "xfs", "hpfs", "jfs", "ufs", "hfs", "hfsplus", "simfs"])
That is a diff between the orig tarball, and the branch contents. They should be identical.