> I still have to go over this in more detail, but my first question (and sorry
> if I missed the answer somewhere)
Nothing to be sorry about... Maybe I missed this question in the standup :$.
> What about sympa and amavisd-new, do they indirectly rely on libcryptx-perl,
> or specifically, on the ed25519 code? Did you also rebuild these reverse
> dependencies, and their tests?
Good point (as ever) ! I'm on it with the tests and checking the code of those reverse dependencies to look for Mail::Dkim inclusions and calls to any removed code in this MP.
I'll go back to you with the conclusions... thanks Andreas!
Hi Andreas!
> I still have to go over this in more detail, but my first question (and sorry
> if I missed the answer somewhere)
Nothing to be sorry about... Maybe I missed this question in the standup :$.
> What about sympa and amavisd-new, do they indirectly rely on libcryptx-perl,
> or specifically, on the ed25519 code? Did you also rebuild these reverse
> dependencies, and their tests?
Good point (as ever) ! I'm on it with the tests and checking the code of those reverse dependencies to look for Mail::Dkim inclusions and calls to any removed code in this MP.
I'll go back to you with the conclusions... thanks Andreas!