466 + void set_image(std::shared_ptr<CursorImage const> const& cursor_image);
Are we really sharing ownership of CursorImage? Wouldn't CursorImage const& be enough?
« Back to merge proposal
466 + void set_image( std::shared_ ptr<CursorImage const> const& cursor_image);
Are we really sharing ownership of CursorImage? Wouldn't CursorImage const& be enough?