Code review comment for lp:~milo/linaro-ci/bug1091564

Revision history for this message
Milo Casagrande (milo) wrote :

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Fathi Boudra <email address hidden> wrote:
> Review: Needs Fixing
>
> Actually, it isn't specific to snowball.
>
> What we want is a sane default: use engineering builds (linux-linaro) hwpacks
> See http://snapshots.linaro.org/quantal/hwpacks
> this is panda, snowball, origen and vexpress.
>
> however, we'll need to be able to use member builds (lt-) hwpacks. An env var will be useful.

Adding an env variable to control that is not that hard.

But I want to better understand the behavior: looking at the link
there, only "panda" has an "lt" hwpack, so should it be treated as
such?
Meaning, if the other boards are passed, never use the "lt" version,
and treat the panda one accordingly with the new env variable.
Is that what you meant?

--
Milo Casagrande
Infrastructure Engineer
Linaro.org <www.linaro.org> │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

« Back to merge proposal