Code review comment for lp:~michihenning/unity-scopes-api/scope-cache-dir
Revision history for this message
| Michi Henning (michihenning) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
> I preferred leaf-net, leaf-fs and aggregator so that you don't have to change
> your code if we ever do implement leaf-fs or aggregator policy in the future
> (note, just because we may never make these available to third party
> developers, it doesn't mean we won't want apparmor policy for our own stuff).
Would the policy for an aggregator every be different from an unconfined scope?
I guess the question is whether I should use "leaf-fs", "leaf-net", "aggregator", and "unconfined"?
It's really neither here nor there to me--the list can be as long as we like and, if some of the directories in there don't exist, the right things still happen.
For the time being, I'll just check for both "aggregator" and "unconfined". That way, we have our bases covered. Michal, Jamie, please speak up if you think this is wrong or if I'm missing something!