On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Matthew Wedgwood <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> I think it's fine calling this saltstack. A lot of Puppet sites run
> masterless, so I wouldn't say that the lack of master/slave support makes
> this less "full." If someone were to add additional support for saltstack,
> it should go in this module.
>
> Thanks again! Sorry to be so picky.
>
No problem - that makes sense and it's an easy s/saltstates/saltstack :)
Pushed with r32.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Matthew Wedgwood <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> I think it's fine calling this saltstack. A lot of Puppet sites run
> masterless, so I wouldn't say that the lack of master/slave support makes
> this less "full." If someone were to add additional support for saltstack,
> it should go in this module.
>
> Thanks again! Sorry to be so picky.
>
No problem - that makes sense and it's an easy s/saltstates/ saltstack :)
Pushed with r32.