> I would actually propose to call it 2.6.0 since this version includes a
> lot of new features.
I think we have advertised a few times that 2.6.0 would contain
EW corrections, so I personally prefer 2.5.6 (not a vry strong
feeling; I'll be happy to go with the majority).
Concerning the review: after the MS bug, I've kept on testing the NLO
bias stuff with cases more involved than single V, and I didn't
find any issues.
Cheers, Stefano.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
> --
> The attached diff has been truncated due to its size.
> Your team MadTeam is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~mg5core1/mg5amcnlo/2.5.6 into lp:mg5amcnlo.
>
Hi Olivier,
> I would actually propose to call it 2.6.0 since this version includes a
> lot of new features.
I think we have advertised a few times that 2.6.0 would contain
EW corrections, so I personally prefer 2.5.6 (not a vry strong
feeling; I'll be happy to go with the majority).
Concerning the review: after the MS bug, I've kept on testing the NLO
bias stuff with cases more involved than single V, and I didn't
find any issues.
Cheers, Stefano.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
> --
> The attached diff has been truncated due to its size.
> Your team MadTeam is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~mg5core1/mg5amcnlo/2.5.6 into lp:mg5amcnlo.
>