Code review comment for ~mdeslaur/ubuntu-cve-tracker:perf-part4

So there's a good difference with the bigger dataset, almost half a second longer:

detailed=True:
$ time ./scripts/active_edit -c CVE-2024-NNN1 -p python-django

real 0m0.848s
user 0m0.752s
sys 0m0.096s

detailed=False:
$ time ./scripts/active_edit -c CVE-2024-NNN1 -p python-django

real 0m0.440s
user 0m0.383s
sys 0m0.056s

I think we're better off keeping a non-detailed dataset, and if we think other tools could benefit from this, we can certainly generate a detailed dataset too. There's no reason why we can't generate a few different pickles there, depending on usage.