On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 21:46 +0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Max Bowsher has proposed merging lp:~maxb/bzr-builddeb/better-error-multiple-upstream-tarballs into lp:bzr-builddeb.
>
> Requested reviews:
> Bzr-builddeb-hackers (bzr-builddeb-hackers)
>
> For more details, see:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~maxb/bzr-builddeb/better-error-multiple-upstream-tarballs/+merge/64090
>
> When attempting to import a package with multiple upstream tarballs, raise
> MultipleUpstreamTarballsNotSupported rather than AssertionError.
>
> The primary motivation is so that the UDD failures categorization will automatically split this case from other kinds of unpack failure.
It would be nice to have a test that verifies that the exception is
raised when there are multiple upstream tarballs.
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 21:46 +0000, Max Bowsher wrote: hackers (bzr-builddeb- hackers) /code.launchpad .net/~maxb/ bzr-builddeb/ better- error-multiple- upstream- tarballs/ +merge/ 64090 mTarballsNotSup ported rather than AssertionError.
> Max Bowsher has proposed merging lp:~maxb/bzr-builddeb/better-error-multiple-upstream-tarballs into lp:bzr-builddeb.
>
> Requested reviews:
> Bzr-builddeb-
>
> For more details, see:
> https:/
>
> When attempting to import a package with multiple upstream tarballs, raise
> MultipleUpstrea
>
> The primary motivation is so that the UDD failures categorization will automatically split this case from other kinds of unpack failure.
It would be nice to have a test that verifies that the exception is
raised when there are multiple upstream tarballs.
Other than that, looks good:
review needsfixing
merge approve
Cheers,
Jelmer